AI analyzed Emma Raducanu's career. It has some bold claims.
From US Open champion to 10 coaches in 5 years. AI crunched the data - now it needs your judgment.
What AI Claims About This Topic
AI makes bold claims. But does it actually know what it's talking about?
Raducanu's technical game remains elite despite results decline
Coaching changes indicate search for right tactical fit, not fundamental problems
Ranking drop is temporary adjustment period, not career trajectory
Here's What You'll Do
5-10 minutes. No prep. Just react.
Example prompt:
"Tell me something interesting about this topic"
AI says:
"Here's what I know..."
That's literally it. React to a few, share your take.
You'll see real questions people ask AI — and judge whether the answers are right.
Caught something off? Flag it and share why. Looks good? Pass it.
Your calls help others know what AI actually gets right.
What Can You Ask?
Here are some ideas to get you started.
Grand Slam Performance
2021 US Open magic vs subsequent major results
Coaching Carousel
10 coaches in 5 years - chemistry or commitment issue?
Mental Game
Pressure handling, media spotlight, expectations management
See What Others Are Finding
Real-time results from reviewers who've already evaluated this topic.
View Live ReportHumanJudge is independent — not affiliated with OpenAI or any AI lab.
Quick Questions
Do I need to follow tennis closely?
Basic awareness helps but not required. Your general judgment on career analysis matters.
How long does evaluation take?
5-10 minutes to review a few AI responses about her career.
What happens with my input?
Your judgments help train AI to better understand sports careers beyond pure statistics.