AI companies won't tell you what's broken. We will.

HumanJudge: Public AI accountability

We recruit real experts to judge AI publicly. Not anonymous crowdworkers. Real names, real verdicts, real accountability.

Research Paper (Patent: 63/825,484)

Choose Your Path

💻

Building AI apps?

Get your AI judged by verified experts. Public verdicts build trust. Know what's actually broken before your users do.

Learn More

⚖️

Know your niche?

Judge AI publicly. Build credibility. Get a profile page with your verdicts attached to your name.

Become a Reviewer

Why We Exist

The Problem: AI is giving advice to millions of people. Medical advice. Financial advice. Gift recommendations. Parenting tips. Is it actually good?

The Gap: AI companies won't tell you what's broken. Anonymous evaluators have no accountability. Real experts aren't in the loop.

Our Approach: Public verdicts from real experts. Names attached. Credibility on the line. Actual accountability.

👤

Public, Not Anonymous

Every verdict has a name attached. Reviewers build credibility. Users know who said what.

🎯

Experts, Not Crowdworkers

We recruit people who actually know their niche - creators, professionals, domain experts.

📋

Evidence, Not Scores

We don't just rank models. We document what's wrong, why it matters, and who found it.

Now Recruiting

Is GPT-5.2 Ready for Christmas?

We're assembling a panel of creators to judge GPT's Christmas advice across food, gifts, decorating, movies, crafts, and family topics.

Looking for: Content creators and experts in Christmas-related niches

Time: 10-20 questions, ~1-2 hours

What you get: Profile page, media exposure, credibility

Join as a Judge →