OpenAI: GPT-5.2

by openai

1,989 claims submitted by 144 reviewers

Performance

Humans Evaluation Benchmark for AI Marketing and Content Generation 93%

1699 votes 118 flags 138 reviewers

日本文化のヒーロー | Japanese Culture Hero 95%

98 votes 5 flags 19 reviewers

AP Calculus AB Challenge: GPT-5.2 100%

76 votes 0 flags 13 reviewers

AP Biology Challenge: GPT-5.2 97%

39 votes 1 flags 39 reviewers

AP English Language Challenge: GPT-5.2 100%

19 votes 0 flags 7 reviewers

K-pop Challenge: GPT-5.2 100%

18 votes 0 flags 2 reviewers

AP US History Challenge: GPT-5.2 100%

15 votes 0 flags 5 reviewers

AP English Literature Challenge: GPT-5.2 100%

14 votes 0 flags 5 reviewers

Chinese Culture Challenge: GPT-5.2 83%

6 votes 1 flags 2 reviewers

AP Government Challenge: GPT-5.2 100%

5 votes 0 flags 5 reviewers

Transparency

Unverified

No Independent Human Evaluation

OpenAI: GPT-5.2 has no publicly available, independent human evaluation process. No open record. No third-party audit. No way for you to verify whether its outputs are reliable, safe, or just confidently wrong.

This is the norm — and it's a problem. Only 17% of people trust AI without oversight. AI benchmarks are broken — companies grade their own homework, then market the results. The gap between what AI companies claim and what consumers actually trust is 40 points wide. Regulators worldwide — from the EU AI Act to NIST standards — are moving toward mandatory independent evaluation. The industry isn't ready.

If you're relying on this AI, you're trusting a black box. No independent audit. No public evaluation record. No way to know if the output you received was good, harmful, or just wrong — until it costs you.

Below are independent claims from HumanJudge's double-blind evaluation — verified human reviewers judged this AI's real outputs without knowing which AI produced them.

Independent Claims

pass AP English Literature Challenge: GPT-5.2 6/8/2026

Fitzgerald builds *The Great Gatsby* around a network of symbols that turn a relatively straightforward plot—one man try...

— Rosario kileiry

pass AP US History Challenge: GPT-5.2 6/8/2026

This is a strong, accurate, and well-balanced answer that directly addresses all three parts of the question: society, e...

— Rosario kileiry

pass AP US History Challenge: GPT-5.2 6/2/2026

This response is balanced, historically accurate, and demonstrates a strong understanding of both the causes and consequ...

— Rosario kileiry

flag AI Marketing & Content Generation 5/31/2026

AI-generated.

— Olutayo Abiodun-Emmanuel

flag AI Marketing & Content Generation 5/31/2026

AI-generated.

— Olutayo Abiodun-Emmanuel

This evaluation was conducted independently. OpenAI: GPT-5.2 did not participate in or pay for this evaluation. All verdicts come from double-blind evaluation — reviewers did not know which AI produced each response.

Is this your product?

Claim your AI's profile, access evaluation data, and get verified.

We help people define what trustworthy AI looks like — publicly, transparently, together. Support this mission